A few people have asked this question and I only found out myself today by reading a long thread on the turbine-dev mailing list. I am glad to see the full discussion there, it gives me hope.
To find out about Plexus/Summit see http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=turbine-dev&m=103474309228654&w=2 and http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=turbine-dev&m=103477746826521&w=2 and http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=turbine-dev&m=103483069518535&w=2 and http://www.apache.org/~jvanzyl/Summit/ Read the whole thread for lots of discussion on what should be done. My personal take is that folk who are using T3, T2.2 in its various beta guises and T2.1 should all plan to move to the latest Turbine version, which may possibly be a packaging of Summit if all goes well. The reasoning behind this is that the codebase for Fulcrum, Torque and Turbine is all rather difficult for the committers to maintain and improve so lets plan to move away from it to something cleaner, easier to understand. This in turn will allow the same effort to produce more/better Avalon 'components' of use to the user community and pluggable into the basic Summit framework. Apologies if I have misunderstood some of the classifications of the technology. Regards David Wynter roamware Ltd. (+44) (0) 208 922 7539 B. (+44) (0) 7879 605 706 M. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:turbine-user-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:turbine-user-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
