I think that I could do that.

On Fri, 2002-11-22 at 12:09, Martin Poeschl wrote:

> could you please write it in xdoc format?
> i think it would be important to have a migration howto added to the site
> 
> martin
> 
> Quinton McCombs wrote:
> 
> >I have recently migrated to T2.2RC1 from T2.1.   I decided to use the
> >decoupled torque.
> >
> >Here is a short list of what I went through to complete the migration
> >(not actually completed).  I will post a more detailed message sometime
> >over the next week or so.
> >
> >1.  Imports need to be changed.  I think that everyone understand this
> >one.
> >
> >2.  Dealing with transactions and obtaining/releasing database
> >connections.
> >     All references to TurbineDB and DBConnection must be changed.  There
> >were only a few place in my application where I needed to obtain a
> >DBConnection object.  It was usually for transaction control.
> >     To make this work with the decoupled torque, I used
> >o.a.torque.util.Transaction and o.a.torque.Torque.  Check the javadocs
> >and you should easily understand how to correctly use them.  
> >
> >3.  Abstract classes & torque.
> >     I had several classes persisting to the same database tables in version
> >2.1.  The new version of torque defines an abstract method called copy()
> >which will return a copy of the object for you.  This must be defined in
> >you classes which extend whatever base class represents the table.  This
> >is going to be really easy...  Torque will define a copyInto() method
> >for you in the base class.  Your implementation just needs to call that
> >method passing a new instance of the sub class.
> >
> >4.  Primary keys are no longer instances of ObjectKey.
> >     This may have been my second biggest headache.  Torque will now
> >generate your classes to use int or Integer (depending upon the setting
> >of javaType and defaultJavaType in xxx-schema.xml).  That is also
> >assuming that you used numbers for your primary keys.
> >
> >5.  Torque generated TurbineUser and other Turbine related tables.
> >     To stop this from happening rename you turbine-schema.xml file to
> >turbine-schema.xml.nogenerate (or anything else for that matter).  It
> >did not do any harm to generate these files but it poses a problem if
> >you reference TurbineUser (or similar object) in your .om classes and
> >forget to import the correct version.
> >
> >6.  Extending turbine user
> >     My application had a very minor extension to TurbineUser.  However,
> >this is where I spent the most time during the migration.  The fact that
> >torque generated the Turbine related tables made me think that life was
> >going to be much easier in this release.  As I started down the road of
> >making changes to turbine-schema.xml to make my extensions, I started to
> >realize what a mistake I had made.
> >     Using Henning's DB security service seemed to be an easy answer. 
> >However, in the end, I could never make it work.  My final road block on
> >this path was the fact that TemplateSessionValidator would put an
> >instance of o.a.t.om.security.TurbineUser into the session.  Granted, I
> >could have rewritten the validator...  It was also going to be a pain
> >because RunData expects the User object to implement
> >o.a.t.om.security.User.   There are also still a few places where (like
> >TemplateSessionValidator) where o.a.t.services.TurbineSecurityService is
> >still coupled.
> >     In the end, I went the route of extending via the old 2.1 method.  Some
> >changes had to be made to get this to work with the new version but it
> >was MUCH easier that the first approach that I took.
> >
> >7.  Scheduled jobs - still in progress
> >     Right now I simply turned off the job scheduler.  It threw an exception
> >during startup as soon as it tried to load the first job from the
> >database tables.  I have not looked at this at all.
> >
> >8.  XMLRPC - still in progress
> >     Right now it is turned off.  I hope that I don't run into any problems
> >with it.
> >
> >9.  Logging
> >     It appears that you need to be using Log4J for your logging if you want
> >any toque messages.  This should also hold true for fulcrum if you
> >decide to use it. 
> >     I have actually found that I like Log4J much better than whatever the
> >default was in 2.1.  It took a little while to figure out how to get the
> >settings configured correctly but after that, no problems.
> >
> >10.  Configuring Torque.properties
> >     It took me a little while to figure out how to get those settings
> >correct to work with Oracle.  I finally found a posting on the mailing
> >list that showed the setting to configure the dsfactory.  Without those
> >settings, torque threw an exception started the ID broker.
> >
> >
> >Well, like I said, that is the short version.  I will try to get more
> >detail broken into several postings.  Hopefully, by the time I am ready,
> >Wiki will be ready for use and I will just put it there.
> >  
> >
> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

>Quinton McCombs<
Strategic Planner, NEqualsOne
 1800 International Park Drive
 Suite 205 
 Birmingham, AL 35243
p: 205.324.8005 x121  800.466.1337
 f: 205.324.7008
e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 www.NEqualsOne.com

Reply via email to