"Chris K Chew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>If you decide to do the NTSecurityService implementation, take a look at
>Turbine3 and Plexus (search the archives), as they are the future of Turbine
>and lend themselves more easily to modular services.
Please stop this FUD.
Turbine 3 is (at least by the people who work on the T 2.2 release)
considered dead and abandoned; we might integrate some of that code
but as the main driving forces behind T3 moved on to other projects
and left us with an undocumented chunk of mediocre code, at least I do
not consider working on T3 an option for the future. Yes, I said
something different a while ago. I might again in the future, too.
Plexus is a pet peeve of JvZ which is worked off-jakarta without input
of others. Jason stated so that he prefers working that way. Martin
and I are currently discussing a road map for post-T2.2 and Plexus
doesn't even show up yet (if ever). We will try to publish it right
after the T 2.2 release and we're talking a short term road map (max
six month) here.
People, please. I do encourage everyone of you to _use_ and work with
the T2.2 and Post-T2.2 releases and Torque 3.0 and not stop doing
this, just because there are some CVS repositories with different
code.
>You can also probably find quite a few people on the list to collaborate on
>the project, as it seems like a popular feature request.
You might also contact Turbine developers off-list and ask for a quote.
Regards
Henning
--
Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen -- Geschaeftsfuehrer
INTERMETA - Gesellschaft fuer Mehrwertdienste mbH [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Am Schwabachgrund 22 Fon.: 09131 / 50654-0 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
D-91054 Buckenhof Fax.: 09131 / 50654-20
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
