On 14/01/2003 11:09 AM, "Arthur I. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm assuming Turbine 2.3 will contain issues relating to the whole > backporting of fulcrum, the methodology for extending Turbine User, > enhancements to Intake. These are the issues I thought 2.3 would > contain. > > What's the case raising the platform requirements for Turbine? The poll is assessing if there is a case to *not* raise the platform requirements for turbine as part of Turbine 2.3. Servlet containers that support Servlet 2.3 have been about for a very long time (the tdk *2.1* shipped with one). Nobody, not even you, has yet indicated that they are using a servlet container that does not support Servlet 2.3. Cheers, Scott -- Scott Eade Backstage Technologies Pty. Ltd. http://www.backstagetech.com.au .Mac Chat/AIM: seade at mac dot com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
