I would suggest replacing the Torque information with a link to the Torque docs, since Torque is now a separate project. If you'd like, you could contribute additional Torque docs to the Torque project. I'm sure they would appreciate that. :)
Maybe the same for Velocity.
The Turbine docs could *also* contain some deep links to the relevant docs in the other projects. That would make it easier for Turbine users, while keeping the docs where they should be.
What do you think?
Eric
Chris K Chew wrote:
Hello.
http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?JakartaTurbine2UsersGuide
I created an ultra-rough-draft outline for the Wiki Turbine User's Guide that we have wanted for some time now. I would greatly appreciate it if everybody takes a look at the outline to judge it for:
*Completeness *Logical Organization
If you think of something that is missing or feel that a topic belongs in a different category, then make a note of it by doing one of the following:
*Make the change on the wiki directly *Send a note to the list and somebody will implement the change *Send an email to me directly and I will implement the change
Once we are generally happy with the outline, I will set us all to work on filling it in.
A quick note about editing the wiki: please be sure to place your name near the change AND supply a comment when saving the page. This helps to elaborate the conversation that Wiki's facilitate.
Thank you,
Chris
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
