--- Scott Tavares <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: jon * <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Turbine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 1999 3:48 PM > Subject: Re: opl > > > > on 12/28/99 12:37 PM, george stewart > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > If someone is looking for something to > contribute, > > > they could submit an implementation of DbBroker > which > > > uses the one in turbine. Can this be done? > > > > > > I've been using Marc Mnich's from java exchange. > I > > > posted something to him about including it in > opl but > > > no answer. > > > > Yes, -1 on using the JavaExchange code. The reason > why we did our own > > connection pool is that I wanted something under a > decent license and with > > source code. Everything else out there either was > not an acceptable > license > > to me (ie: GPL) or was like the JE stuff and > didn't have source code. jon, the java exchange stuff isn't in cvs. What's in cvs is broker manager and a broker interface, so you can add any broker you want. I have the same comment about this as to Scott, does anybody think it's awful to have an "open" solution which allows the user to plug in his own broker. > > > > Also, it had to be singleton based. > > > > The Turbine, the connection pool follows all those > requirements and works > > quite well. It should be REALLY easy to use it > with OPal. > > Is there anything in the current OPL code that prevents plugging in the turbine broker. -- george __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger. http://messenger.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------------ To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
