> > I prefer this over the previous alternative as well although I 
> don't like
> > adding non-Turbine stuff to TurbineResources.properties.
> 
> I don't see this part as a major issue.
> 
> -jon


Yeah it's not a big deal to do this.
I just think think using getResourceAsStream() is a cleaner approach.


------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?:           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to