> > I prefer this over the previous alternative as well although I > don't like > > adding non-Turbine stuff to TurbineResources.properties. > > I don't see this part as a major issue. > > -jon Yeah it's not a big deal to do this. I just think think using getResourceAsStream() is a cleaner approach. ------------------------------------------------------------ To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- screen.homepage Kimbro Staken
- Re: screen.homepage John McNally
- Re: screen.homepage jon *
