David Warnock wrote:
>
> Brett,
>
> > public void init(Object ob);
> >
> > public Object get();
> >
> > public boolean execute() throws ServiceException;
>
> Just a couple of thoughts
>
> Could we add
>
> public boolean execute(Object ob) throws ServiceException;
-1. You can achieve this same thing with init(Object ob) and then
execute(). I don't want to have to know which is the appropriate
execute() method to call depending on the service type. That means I
can't dynamically load/run services, because I have to figure out the
type to see which execute() needs to be run; the one with the parameter
or the one without. As long as you always all init(), and always call
execute(), yoiu're all set.
-Brett
>
> I think this would make it easier for services that are built as
> singletons (ie a servlet type model, with one object and multiple
> threads).
>
> If this is added then I guess it would be sensible to add the same for
> get(Object ob)
>
> Dave
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
