>
> Is there a reason we are allowing Turbine.java to stay outside of a
> package?
>
> It requires an alias for the init properties file. So why not have:
>
> <servlet>
> <servlet-name>turbine</servlet-name>
> <servlet-class>org.apache.turbine.Turbine</servlet-class>
>
> <!-- also add init params -->
> </servlet>
>
> Then again maybe I am missing something ;)
Because early on, I wanted people to be able to install Turbine without
having to add that alias. I wanted it to be as easy as possible.
Is there so reason why this really bugs you? I have yet to hear a good
argument about why to move it. John and Frank tried to convince me a long
time ago and they gave up. ;-)
btw, on the Exception deal...if you want to change the code go for it, but
i'm not going to do it. ;-)
-jon
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
