> It is a surprise to see the Java Apache project decide to distribute the > Sun jars > in its distribution. I thought there was some liability from the language > of the > Sun Community License. Has Sun changed its license? Has Java Apache > changed its > policy? These files are not under the SCSL. The source code is, these are the binaries which are under a different license. I'm the person who nixed the JSDK inclusion with Apache JServ and that was for other reasons which I really don't have time to explain right now (it is archived in various mailing lists). > jaf-1.0.1.jar not activation-1.0.1.jar > javamail-1.1.2.jar not mail-1.1.2.jar > > Did we intentionally change their names or has Sun changed them? I changed the names. There is a README.txt file in the lib directory that explains what each file is. -jon ------------------------------------------------------------ To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
