Stephen Adkins wrote:
>
> Dave,
>
> For what it's worth, here are my opinions.
> I see here three levels of functionality in a scheduler.
>
> Type 1: Single-threaded
> Type 2: Multi-threaded, no dependencies
> Type 3: Multi-threaded, with dependencies
>
> My recommendations:
>
> Type 1 functionality be fully implemented first and should go into the
> first release of Turbine (release 2.0 ;-> ). This is a minimum
> acceptable level of scheduler functionality.
> Type 2 should be implemented thereafter.
I need this now. I am probably going to work on this ASAP.
> Type 3 is a much more complex issue and should only be undertaken
> after you have gathered a lot of requirements.
<snip>
--
Kevin A Burton ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://relativity.yi.org
Message to SUN: "Please Open Source Java!"
"For evil to win is for good men to do nothing."
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
