On Sun, May 07, 2000 at 11:16:15AM -0700, jon * wrote:
> > Oh - you _did_ implement this. Cool - although I'm sure I remember getting
> > a -1 for this :-)
>
> Yea. I did -1 it didn't I? :-(
>
> I'm sorry. I just went back and re-read your post and I think I interpreted
> it wrongly the first time. I was thinking that you meant something else.
> Mass confusion on my part. I will read what you are saying more closely for
> now on. :-)
(realising I didn't answer this)
Thanks - no worries. It just got me a bit confused myself :-)
> Either way, now you don't even have to call getContext() any longer. :-)
Indeed, smooth.
--
Sean Legassick
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
...promoting the underground...
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
