On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 12:57:13PM -0700, Jon Stevens wrote:
> * There is a new bit of terminology that I'm going to start referring to. It
> is called Model 2+1. It is a +1 on the Model 2 development approach that was
> discussed in this paper:
>
> <http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-12-1999/jw-12-ssj-jspmvc.html>
Good article! Sets out the methodology simply and clearly.
>
> I see Turbine fitting right into this model, but also expanding on it quite
> a bit to provide further support for defining things like a consistent
> methodology for handling form submission (actions), navigation, screens, etc
> as well as supporting more than one template language in a consistent
> manner. Hence, Turbine is now Model 2+1. :-)
Indeed Turbine offers a whole lot more, so my +1 to Model 2+1 (FWIW).
Also, as the other javaworld article that Chris posted a link to, people
have a habit of judging MVC by a few unrepresentative examples, so
having a different buzzword is useful.
(I'd love to come to the meeting by the way - but I'm in London :-( )
--
Sean Legassick
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
