On Thu, Jun 29, 2000 at 10:37:15PM -0400, Nissim wrote: > I don't think that's necessary for the following reason: > > 1) The logic to create the transaction for postgres will only be in the > BasePeer methods which don't take a DBConnection parameter. Okay that makes sense - if you're passing in a DBConnection then you're in a transaction so you don't need the auto stuff. -- Sean Legassick [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------ To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: [PATCH] Re: DB (Postgres & Transactions, unresolved... Nissim
- Re: [PATCH] Re: DB (Postgres & Transactions, unresolved... Sean Legassick
- [PATH] SqlExpression Slawomir Gawin
- Re: [PATH] SqlExpression John McNally
- RE: [PATH] SqlExpression Slawomir Gawin
- Re: [PATH] SqlExpression John McNally
- Re: [PATCH] Re: DB (Postgres & Transactions, unresolved... John McNally
- Re: [PATCH] Re: DB (Postgres & Transactions, unresolved... Sean Legassick
- Re: DB (Postgres & Transactions, unresolved issues) Daniel L. Rall
- Re: DB (Postgres & Transactions, unresolved issues) Nissim
- Non-HTML Screens Sean Legassick
- Non-HTML Screens Jason van Zyl
- Re: Non-HTML Screens Sean Legassick
- Re: Non-HTML Screens Jason van Zyl
- Re: Non-HTML Screens Sean Legassick
- Non-HTML Screens Regis Koenig
- Re: Non-HTML Screens Sean Legassick
- VOTE Non-HTML Screens Regis Koenig
- Re: VOTE Non-HTML Screens Jon Stevens
- Re: VOTE Non-HTML Screens Regis Koenig
- Re: VOTE Non-HTML Screens Jon Stevens
