Whether parameters get added as pathinfo or querydata should be up to the
app designer. They may want the page spiderable, they may just as likely
prefer that the page not be spidered. DynamicURI gives complete flexibility
here. It places the action and screen in pathinfo by default. But there is
no requirement to use it this way.
new DynamicURI(data, "myScreen", "myAction")
new DynamicURI(data, "myScreen").addQueryData("action", "myAction")
ParameterParser/Turbine is happy with the resulting URL either way.
My proposal does not change this behavior.
John McNally
----- Original Message -----
From: Daniel L. Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Turbine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2000 4:16 PM
Subject: Re:
> Jon Stevens wrote:
> >
> > on 7/14/2000 2:57 PM, "Daniel L. Rall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > What's bad about "?" ?
> >
> > it isn't indexed by search engines. that was the whole reason for the
> > path_info hack in Parameterparser to begin with.
> >
> > example: do a search on almost any search engine (ie: google/altavista)
and
> > tell me how many websites come up with a ? in the URI.
> >
> > i don't want to limit applications like Jyve with that.
>
> +1, without a doubt
> --
>
> Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
