dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Comments?
>
> turbine
> | --- bin ( no change )
> | --- build ( no change )
> | --- conf ( same except moved TurbineXMLMapBuilder to sample )
> | --- doc ( just html here )
> | | --- images
> |
> | --- tools ( all code generation stuff...MapBuilders, etc...)
> | --- admin ( contains the admin/scheduler app. Will rename packages to
> | org.apache.turbine.admin.screens,actions, stc... )
> | --- samples ( all the sample code removed from the core.. renamed
> | packages to org.apache.turbine.sample)
> | --- lib ( same )
> | --- src ( see below )
> | --- sql ( contains all the DB schemas )
> | --- see below from other stuff..
>
> src contains - sql, modules, om, services, util
> under the org.apache.turbine directory. Everything is the same under
> org.apache. All other empty directories have been removed.
If the admin modules are the same package ( org.apache.turbine.* ) why not
have it under src/java? Seems akward out there and really contains source
code, so it should be under src if it is to stay 'part of turbine'. We could
still build seperate jars if we wanted.
Otherwise it makes sense to completely remove it from the turbine tree
entirely and create another application ( like jyve ) but for turbine
administration that applications could just plug in. Just my 3 cents.
jb
Jeff Brekke
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://sites.netscape.net/ekkerbj
____________________________________________________________________
Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account today at
http://webmail.netscape.com.
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
