on 7/26/2000 1:30 PM, "Daniel L. Rall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is the global cache inefficient? I hate having duplicate code, and I
> think that the guts of ConnectionPool could be replaced without
> modifying the external interface.
It isn't that it is inefficient, it is that they have different design
purposes. I don't think GC is as efficient as a simple Stack process, but it
has a lot more flexibility as a tradeoff.
-jon
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
