Leon Messerschmidt wrote:
> [snip]
> Now we can just let it fall through and let Village handle the rest. I suspect
> Village cycles through the resultset <NumRows> times. Because the actual data is
> only transported once you ask for it this could give you the desired effect, it
> think?
>
> Might be a little slower that using a native LIMIT statement, but we can use it
> over *any* database that is currently supported.
>
> Any thoughts?
I think that this cross-database support that is built into Turbine adds
quite a bit of value and that we should continue to support it, as you
suggest here. +1
--
Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://collab.net/ | open source | do the right thing
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
