on 8/8/2000 7:42 PM, "Paul O'Leary" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ug.
>
> This mutex implementation is pretty bad: serializes all create/acquire
> calls through a synchronized *static* method *and* it looks like it has its
> own threading bugs.
> It's not really a mutex either; more like a little namespace lock.
>
> I'll see if I can scare up a/o write some better synchronization primitives.
>
> PaulO.
It is _really_ old code that Pier wrote a long ass time ago before he knew
Java. I never really looked at it closely or used it...just offered it as a
suggestion for use.
-jon
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
