on 8/28/2000 5:59 PM, "Paul O'Leary" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I spent some time today going through the connection pool code. I remember
> Jon once rhetorically asking 'what was wrong with Turbine's connection
> pool'? This is my answer ;) I have a lot of DB and concurrency experience
> so it seemed like low hanging fruit.
:-) Finally someone responds to my challenge! :-)
> Hope there's some other propeller heads out there like me who find this
> stuff interesting. I've implemented and maintainted quite a few
> closed-source connection pools, some more complicated than others; I'd love
> to see just *one* open source pool that gets it all right so I never have to
> do it again!
>
> I'll append my patch to DBBroker.java. Please treat these changes as
> proposed - I'm not set up to test them right now. I'd also appreciate
> immediate - but gentle :) - feedback as to whether the patch formatting is
> appropriate, useable, etc.
Paul, I really needed news like this. This makes my day. You kick ass.
Everything looks perfect. Lets create the best pool out there!
-jon
--
http://scarab.tigris.org/ | http://noodle.tigris.org/
http://java.apache.org/ | http://java.apache.org/turbine/
http://www.working-dogs.com/ | http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/
http://www.collab.net/ | http://www.sourcexchange.com/
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
