On Wed, 30 Aug 2000, you wrote:
> The way it has been done, seems the easiest to me and is very flexible. I
> am not sure why it is more desirable to have <html>, <head>, etc. in the
> layout. I have found so far that it is probably required for JSP (if I can
> get it to work at all,) so I am trying to work within that framework.
>
> In Rafal's design you add a Head object to the context. Then screen
> templates can add stuff to it. In the previous method the Head object was
> added to the Context through RunData, data.getPage.getHead(), so it would
> seem to me that from the screen templates' point of view things are about
> the same. And navigations lose their access to the Head object in the new
> way, maybe no big deal.
>
> Why again is this better? (You have probably already told me, I will go look
> again.)
I'm thinking about page authors using things like Dreamweaver or other
tools that would generate full html pages <html><head>. our current
configure could cause some hassle. I'm just thinking if we wnat
to change this stuff, now is the time.
--
dave
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
----------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
