on 8/30/2000 11:13 PM, "Tim Joyce" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I ask because I
> get the impression that unless you are proficient at "messing about", it
> appears that Turbine is difficult to get working. I'm not saying this is a
> bad thing, it is just a different approach to the webmacro style.
Let me also enforce that we are not here trying to make things hard on
people and you really shouldn't assume that. We are working our hardest that
we possibly can.
Turbine is actually a MUCH larger codebase (there is like 250+ .java files
alone) and covers a lot more technologies than WM is/does. That fact alone
makes it a very large responsibility for a lot of people. I think we are
being pretty successful right now as we are making a lot of strides forward
thanks to all the people contributing right now.
I think that it is our goal to make this the easiest to use and best web app
framework out there. Come contribute to making that happen. :-)
-jon
--
http://scarab.tigris.org/ | http://noodle.tigris.org/
http://java.apache.org/ | http://java.apache.org/turbine/
http://www.working-dogs.com/ | http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/
http://www.collab.net/ | http://www.sourcexchange.com/
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
