> The way it has been done, seems the easiest to me and is very
> flexible. I
> am not sure why it is more desirable to have <html>, <head>,
> etc. in the
> layout. I have found so far that it is probably required for
> JSP (if I can
> get it to work at all,) so I am trying to work within that framework.
I won't claim I understand what you are trying to do, but it
seems that you could also solve the problem of using FRAMESETs
within Turbine. A FRAMESET cannot have <body> tags.
--
Gonzalo A. Diethelm
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
