> > Er... Using $Id$ is perfectly fine. The first time
> > you commit the file, it is properly expanded.
>
> No. It isn't. Feel free to try it yourself. It _has_ to be of
> the format
>
> $Id: $
>
> ...anything else will not work. Try it yourself. :-)
I have... for the past weeks, I have been adding $Id$ tags
to files that didn't have them. In fact, I'm about to commit
files in util/upload; grep says:
FileHandler.java:80: * @version $Id$
FileItem.java:85: * @version $Id$
MultipartStream.java:116: * @version $Id$
Here I go with the commit:
[momentous pause]
and now grep says:
FileHandler.java:80: * @version $Id: FileHandler.java,v 1.2 2000/09/05
23:33:47 gonzalo Exp $
FileItem.java:85: * @version $Id: FileItem.java,v 1.4 2000/09/05 23:33:47
gonzalo Exp $
MultipartStream.java:116: * @version $Id: MultipartStream.java,v 1.2
2000/09/05 23:33:47 gonzalo Exp $
There you go! Could it be your knowledge comes from an old
version of RCS/CVS, where you really had to use $Id: $?
I have used CVS for years (really) now, and I have ALWAYS
used just $Id$ to add new ID tags.
> -jon
--
Gonzalo A. Diethelm
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
