On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 09:39:40AM -0700, Craig Berry wrote:
> Unfortunately, the current user authentication scheme puts the
> validateUser(user, pwd) method in UserFactory, and builds in the assumption
> that the password is retrieved and
> compared. If this were replaced with a User.validate() method taking no
> arguments,
> derived, specialized user classes could handle their own validation in any
> desired way
> without requiring changes to the Turbine base code. This would seem to be a
> better
> compartmentalization of design.
+1 on having a User.validate method
> Any comments? If this makes sense, is anyone with more experience than I
> interested
> in taking it on, or should I give it a shot myself? (I have essentially
> zero open-
> source dev experience, so I'm a bit wary about trying to do this.)
Why not give it a shot, post the diff here and see what we think :-)
It's the only way to get started...
--
Sean Legassick
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
homo sum: humani nihil a me alienum puto
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
