> I would like to move the connection pool implementation from the
> org.apache.turbine.util.db.pool package into a new
> org.apache.turbine.services.db.pool package. My idea is that we leave a
> skeleton connection pool in the old org.apache.turbine.util.db.pool
> package which delegates to the new implementation for backwards
> compatiblity. All methods in the old package would be deprecated. Your
> thoughts, noble Turbine developers?
Where would the stuff like DB* be? I assume that you would be moving all
the classes from org.apache.turbine.util.db.pool to
org.apache.turbine.services.db.pool including DBBroker and DB*
implementations.
Just a thought: How about having org.apache.turbine.services.db.broker and
org.apache.turbine.services.db.pool as separate packages? They are in
effect two different services and you could theoretically use ConnectionPool
without DBBroker. Maybe with some other O-R tool or something - I don't
have anything specific in mind :-)
~ Leon
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
