"Diethelm Guallar, Gonzalo" wrote:
> 
> > > BTW, I also checked and modified stuff in org/apache/java and
> > > org/apache/jserv.  If I should NOT have done that, please let
> > > me know and I'll revert those changes.
> >
> > Even if the JServ stuff is being handled as a vendor fork, -1
> > on making
> > cosmetic modifications to it.  +1 on making them to the
> > Turbine source,
> > however.  I am not sure about the java directory...
> 
> I tend to agree with you. However, besides cosmetic changes
> (in order to bring the files to the proposed Turbine guidelines),
> I also added many missing Javadoc entries. How about these?

These types of changes should be committed back to the JServ project.

> I would really like to hear other people's opinions on this,
> especially Jon's.

I'm sure Jon would help get the JavaDoc additions included.
-- 

Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?:           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to