Rafal Krzewski wrote:
> [snip]
> with the proposed setup, the User implementation is pluggable independently
> from ACL implementation. I believe this is good, because it's quite probable
> that you will be able to use LDAP to auth your user, but your ACLs will stay
> in the DB, because you won't have control over the LDAP server.
> The other possiblility is to write an User implementation that keeps personal
> data in the DB but uses JAAS to authenticate the user in a NT domain.
YES! Beautiful, +1.
--
Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://collab.net/ | open source | do the right thing
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
