on 9/15/2000 10:18 AM, "Fedor Karpelevitch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> THis is not really acceptable, because foreign keys should reference
> primary/unique keys only. Having two single-column FKs is completely
> different from one two-column. They ha ve nothing to do with each other.
>
> fedor.
ahh...ok...I'm showing my database schema stupidity again. :-)
-jon
--
http://scarab.tigris.org/ | http://noodle.tigris.org/
http://java.apache.org/ | http://java.apache.org/turbine/
http://www.working-dogs.com/ | http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/
http://www.collab.net/ | http://www.sourcexchange.com/
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
