on 9/27/2000 11:59 AM, "Fedor Karpelevitch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> - They are supported differently in different DBs
> - I personally do not see much use in them (at least in newtorque)
> - Supporting them only adds unneccessary work.
>
> So I suggest that we drop support for them in newtorque. What your opinions
> here?
Seems fine to me to drop them if they are really tough to properly support.
> Would it make sense to do some sort of review of what features we want and
> do not want in newtorque? Any ideas on this?
A requirements specification would be excellent.
-jon
--
http://scarab.tigris.org/ | http://noodle.tigris.org/
http://java.apache.org/ | http://java.apache.org/turbine/
http://www.working-dogs.com/ | http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/
http://www.collab.net/ | http://www.sourcexchange.com/
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
