Using a Set would lose the order of the packages. In TR.props, it says that
the packages are searched in order.
-pete
On Wed, 04 Oct 2000, you wrote:
> What about using Set?
>
> "Diethelm Guallar, Gonzalo" wrote:
> >
> > > > Quick solution: would it be Ok to replace that code with
> > > >
> > > > Vector packages = TurbineResources.getVector("module.packages");
> > > > String basePackage = GenericLoader.getBasePackage();
> > > > if (! vector.contains(basePackage))
> > > > packages.addElement( basePackage );
> > > >
> > > > everywhere? If yes, would this be a candidate for a utility
> > > > function, and where (what class)?
> > >
> > > That is totally the right way to do it.
> >
> > I just tested this, and it seems to work. What's best, I'm back
> > to the original observed performance. Hurrah!
> >
> > > Send a patch. :-)
> >
> > Better than that, I'll commit this myself! However, I have
> > a (code-commit-newbie) question: this could be a routine like
> >
> > public static boolean addOnce(Vector v, Object o)
> > {
> > if (! v.contains( o ))
> > v.addElement( o );
> > }
> >
> > Where would this go? Or should I just write those lines
> > everywhere it's needed (bad form)?
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Peter Recore
Software Engineer
Digital Media on Demand
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
