On 10 Oct 2000, Gunnar R|nning wrote:
> Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The first problem is an initial startup problem, it
> > seems upon initial bombarding velocity just plain
> > screws up. But if you give it a breather it performs
> > amazingly well. In my primitive testing environment
> > I have consistently beaten WM by at least 20%, sometimes
> > this number approaches 30% _after_ the first hit.
> >
>
> I would like to see your test cases - benchmarks claims is always kinds of
> fuzzy without any hard data - they may also vary greatly depending on
> your test platform.
That's why they are strictly on the development list. I have
asked a few people to run some benchmarks. But before I make
any statements on the user list, or put the results on the
Velocity website, I will run extensive benchmarks rest assured.
> What you really care about is functionality,
> stability and performance of your application - in that order.
You have total agreement here.
> But if you beat WM in stability and performance while preserving the
> functionality you would be a serious contender. May the best win !
Thanks!
jvz.
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
