on 10/11/2000 5:04 AM, "Christoph Reck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since the view and the controller are tightly coupled in turbine,
> it is stated to follow the Model2 design pattern, with a + 1
> addition due to way actions are used (hence Model 2 + 1).
That is a GREAT explanation and I'm going to use that for now on...except it
isn't entirely true. :-)
The +1 was a joke on my part to see what people would do with it. I figured
that people were believing this Model 2 hype with JSP and such and I wanted
to improve on it. I love playing with marketing games. I read that Model 2
paper and then figured that Turbine was better than what they declared as
Model 2.
Calling it Model 3 would have been like saying that Turbine was just a third
generation of Model 2. So, instead I figured that making it +1 just made it
appear to be an improved Model 2 model since that is what Turbine really is.
:-)
LOL. You all fell into my evil trap! :-) LOL.
-jon
--
http://scarab.tigris.org/ | http://noodle.tigris.org/
http://java.apache.org/ | http://java.apache.org/turbine/
http://www.working-dogs.com/ | http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/
http://www.collab.net/ | http://www.sourcexchange.com/
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
