on 10/13/2000 12:10 AM, "Fedor Karpelevitch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> This is mostly to Leon.
> What about removing timestamp from OM classes' templates?
> The problem is, as newtorque is not yet smart enough to only regenerate
> changed classes it regenerates all of them on any change and even if the
> table was not changed the class will have a new timestamp and this adds
> a lot of garbage to commit logs and makes real changes less visible. If
> you have no problem with this could you make the change and commit it?
-1. The reason is that I don't mind the garbage in commit logs and I
appreciate knowing when the class was last generated.
-jon
--
http://scarab.tigris.org/ | http://noodle.tigris.org/
http://java.apache.org/ | http://java.apache.org/turbine/
http://www.working-dogs.com/ | http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/
http://www.collab.net/ | http://www.sourcexchange.com/
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
