> He believes it has something to do with the way
> the URL is represented. In that it should be
> 
> file://d/path/to/logfile
> 
> as opposed to
> 
> file://d:\path\to\logfile
> 
> Anyone know for sure what the correct form of
> the URL would be for:
> 
> d:\path\to\logfile ?

I think it should be:

  file:///d:/path/to/file

Notice the three slashes after file:.

> jvz.


-- 
Gonzalo A. Diethelm
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?:           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to