> So far we are looking at Peers, Castor, and TOPLink.
>
> Peers has the obvious advantage of being integrated into Turbine. What we
> don't see is the automatic mapping of an object hierarchy. With TOPLink for
> example, we save our top-level object and all the objects in the hierarchy
> are automatically persisted. Is this capability in Peers and I have missed
> it? If not, how are other folks handling this?
Huh? Could you be a bit more clear please? If you can explain what you want,
I'm sure that we can add it...or you can also scratch your own itch. :-)
> Castor looks to me like it will, some day, be what we need, but isn't there
> yet. Would anyone care to offer some user experience with Castor?
I personally am more into Peer's than I am into Castor. Castor is trying to
solve to many problems IMHO and I don't really understand Exoffice...I mean
intalio's position with OSS since it seems to change weekly.
> TOPLink would seem to do everything we want, but is an expensive commercial
> product. Any feedback on TOPLink would also be appreciated.
commercial. no opinion other than I hope you don't find a bug in it...
-jon
--
Scarab -
Java Servlet Based - Open Source
Bug/Issue Tracking System
<http://scarab.tigris.org/>
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
