Wow! Thanks for the all speedy help. I will be a little more thorough in looking through the source next time (PP). Interesting fact about the JIT and the line numbers...I've wondered where those went. Nissim's suggestion of using dots for screens as well makes a lot of sense from my (obviously novice) perspective. Interesting that the answer to a question about which I've wondered for a while was hidden in the message footers. That is truly the last character data I would think to parse as I read the list. ;) We adopted Servlets/Turbine/WebMacro about a month ago for development work here (at a small medical software startup). I just wanted to say that I am really impressed with the amount and utility of the code, as well as the activity and expertise on this list. Thanks for providing a great toolset, and really helping support it. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Jon Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 03, 2000 12:44 PM To: Turbine Subject: Re: Question regarding pathname specification for screens and actions <helpful solution snipped> > P.S. Is there a handy way to search the list on-line? > It looks like I would have to download the daily summaries, > put them in a directory, and do a flat file search. Somehow, > it seems there might be an easier way. At the bottom of EVERY single email to this list is the following: Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/> > P.P.S. The tops of the three relevant stack traces follow: Totally useless cause you have the JIT turned on so we can't see the line numbers (where it says "Compiled Code"). -jon -- ------------------------------------------------------------ To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
