"Diethelm Guallar, Gonzalo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Not really. As I see it, moving the logging facility to a
> service would have one drawback: it would not be possible
> to use it from a stand-alone app that wants to use Turbine
> as a class library, not a servlet (like torque does or will
> do). Would this be a problem? I guess the logging facility
> could be moved to a service and still present an interface
> usable for these cases...
There is no problem using Turbine services in a stand alone
application (i.e. library fashion). There is one simple step of
calling the properties/services initializer yourself.
--
Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
