[snip]
>
> * Should we hear the comments from that guy about Informix, and
> use TB, TRB or TRBN as a prefix (object name lengths) instead
> of TURBINE?
How about the following:
Torque could be changed to shorten the names of db-objects to a specified
length.
A second way could be that the xml-scheme gets a new element for an optional
db-object name.
Both ways the Java classes could have the complete name and only the
database objects
have shortened names.
I could look at this, but I am not shure if I am deep enough in the relevant
parts of the framework.
>
> * Why do you define indexes that are identical to the primary key
> definitions? Shouldn't this be handled internally by the DB?
>
> * From looking at the current fields in TURBINE_USER, I think the
> minimum fields should be:
>
> user_id
> created
> modified
> last_login
> objectdata
>
> How do you know you will always use a login_name? Or the user's
> first and last name? e-mail may not always be necessary; etc.
> However, the fields mentioned above are necessary for Turbine
> to be able to handle a user.
>
Stefan
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
