Re: proposal: Patch to org.apache.java.util

[Daniel Rall]

Rafal Krzewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Daniel Rall wrote:
> 
> > > I'd vote +1 to Magnus' patch if we agree at the point that patching the
> > > code inherited from JServ is OK.
> > 
> > Turbine is becoming org.apache.util.
> 
> What do you mean? Are our classes going to change package names?
> This would break *all* Turbine dependent code in existence...

Hehe, no no.  :)
The Turbine code base is just extremely useful.


------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?:           [EMAIL PROTECTED]