On 2000.12.06 10:38:03 +0000 Rafal Krzewski wrote:
> And how should that work? Take the highest priorty of the
> TurbineExceptions
> in the chain, and then compare to the loggers level of verbosity?
> I might implement that, but I feel it's kind of an overkill. The
> exceptions
> that are considered normal during the operation of the application
> should
> be caught, others should be passed to the Turbine servlet, and the
> administrator
> should know about those. This seems to be good enough for me.
Yes I think you're right, that's certainly good enough for me too.
> > > What is your (and others) inclination?
> >
> > I think that Exceptions should be propogated up. Also I would like the
> > ability to plug in an exception handler that Turbine.java would call -
> that
> > way I could arrange to mail reports to an administrator etc. Should be
> easy
> > with a TR property specifying a class that implements a standard
> interface.
>
> +1
I'll have a look at this...
--
Sean Legassick
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hombre soy, nada humano me puede ser ajeno
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
