Jon Stevens wrote:
> on 12/8/2000 2:12 PM, "Will Stranathan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> As for M(2), I'm not sure I get it. For M(1), are you talking about the
> content that happens to reside within the template and M(2) being the data
> in the database?
>
Sorry, I think of the "global set of objects" as a duplicate of the
model data, but now that I re-read everything, there is no duplication -
model data isn't requested from the store until the template requests it
from the "global set of objects".
> Lastly, one more dimension that we need to start thinking about is adding in
> some sort of workflow system to Turbine so that we can control the
> application workflow business logic outside of the templates such that you
> can define things like this: (for example, with Scarab:)
>
Hmmmm...sounds a lot like PVCS Dimensions. That was probably the only
GOOD thing about Dimensions - a definable process model. (Considering
that Merant calls Dimensions a process control system, I suppose they
had to get that much right.)
But I understand now. I think it will be difficult to enforce the
policies without asking either the web person to write too much code, or
moving backwards - back toward the PUSH model. (MVCC lite?)
Will
>
> thanks,
>
> -jon
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
