I totally back up your proposal Mr. McNally.
I think that is a very good idea.
____________________________________________
Sarbjit Singh
Syntegra (USA)
Enterprise Internet Solutions Group
Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Phone : (651) 415-3082
Address: Syntegra (USA)
4201 Lexington Avenue North
Arden Hills, MN 55126
Office 1S247
Web: http://www.syntegra.com
http://www.cs.umn.edu/~sasingh
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John McNally
> Sent: Friday, December 15, 2000 7:02 PM
> To: Turbine
> Subject: [Proposal] keywords
>
>
> I was thinking some time ago that it might be a good idea to make the
> url keywords configurable. This could be easily accomplished in
> TR.props. I actually was thinking more along the lines of satisfying
> users that for some reason or another did not like the name "screen" to
> mean a Java class that gets executed to generate some portion of the
> response. Or did not like the "template" keyword. But it turns out
> that "action" might cause some problems if used in a certain way. I'm
> not actually proposing to do it, but I thought I would put it up to a
> vote to see what objections there might be.
>
> John McNally
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
