on 1/17/01 6:33 AM, "Magnus ?or Torfason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, that seems likely, but on the other hand, the memory requirements seem
> a little high. Isn't the default setting something like 20 meg? And that
> is blown with 30 tables, it seems a bit high. Actually it also seems to me
> that the memory requirements should not even be going linearly up with an
> increased amount of tables.
>
> Note that i have not studied the torque code, and so I do not know what I am
> talking about. It would however seem appropriate that someone who does
> could comment in a few lines on why the memory requirement is so huge.
>
> Magnus
Again, I think that it is all JVM related.
-jon
--
Honk if you love peace and quiet.
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
