on 1/23/01 5:23 AM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> 2) TurbineServices implements nicely the ServiceBroker interface and
> provides protected constructors. However, the instance member is private and
> the getInstance method returns a reference to the class instance, not to the
> implemented interface, although the getService method of the interface is
> almost the only one needed outside the class. A possibility to extend and
> customize the TurbineServices instance would make it possible to support
> other service construction methods than Class.forName and additional broker
> mechanisms.

Ok, I think that I have this resolved now. I will be checking in the code
shortly.

thanks!

-jon



------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?:           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to