on 1/31/01 1:58 AM, "Rafal Krzewski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I hope that this will work for you, and we can remove getConfig() from
> the interface.
> (which I am strongly +1 on)
done. I didn't like it either.
> 1) We may ignore the situation, treat Configurations/ExtendedProperties
> as a black box
> and continue to use it to implement ResourceService.
> 2) We might skip Configurations as an extra level of indirection and use
> ExtendedProperties
> directly to implement ResourceService
> 3) We might try to replace ResourceService with Configurations or merge
> these two together.
>
> Opinions?
Any of the above is fine with me.
-jon
--
Honk if you love peace and quiet.
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]