on 1/31/01 1:58 AM, "Rafal Krzewski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I hope that this will work for you, and we can remove getConfig() from
> the interface.
> (which I am strongly +1 on)

done. I didn't like it either.

> 1) We may ignore the situation, treat Configurations/ExtendedProperties
> as a black box 
> and continue to use it to implement ResourceService.
> 2) We might skip Configurations as an extra level of indirection and use
> ExtendedProperties
> directly to implement ResourceService
> 3) We might try to replace ResourceService with Configurations or merge
> these two together.
> 
> Opinions?

Any of the above is fine with me.

-jon

-- 
Honk if you love peace and quiet.




------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?:           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to