Sean Legassick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 01:38:39PM -0800, Daniel Rall wrote:
> > Yeah, someone else (Sean?) pointed out my err as well. As I
> > understand the double-checked locking issue, it has more to do with
> > double-checked locking used in combination with object instantiation.
> > Please correct me if I misunderstand. :)
>
> You don't misunderstand, but this is object instantiation - the
> instantiation of the Vector of field names. The idea being that if
> double check locking was used, a different thread could get access to a
> partially constructed Vector object...
Heh. I'm going to end this thread here, as I obviously didn't read
the commit log diff carefully enough. ;)
--
Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
