[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Yes, that would be a simple, but yet flexible way to "load" a customized
> broker to the framework, although bootstrap() must contain a default
> implementation as static abstract is not allowed ;-).
OK, I didn't know about that one. A dummy implementation will be also
fine.
It looks like we have this worked out. I'll implement the changes soon.
Rafal
--
Rafal Krzewski
Senior Internet Developer
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+48 22 8534830 http://e-point.pl
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
