Daniel Rall wrote:
>
> Leon Messerschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > "Colin Chalmers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > > > Jason, you were right ;-))
> > > >
> > > > After adding the firstbuild file *all* files were generated correctly.
> > >
> > > If anyone has any ideas on improving this processes, please make
> > > suggestions. :)
> >
> > How about adding a "file_exists" utility method to the file handling object
> > that gets added to the context to check whether a file exists. If it does
> > not exist we create the new files otherwise we leave them alone.
>
> That sounds reasonable. John, you currently have the check
> implemented with Ant, right? Thoughts on the switch? Also, it would
> be nice if we performed the check on a per-table basis, checking
> whether the user-modifiable business object exists. Some one may add
> tables to their schema, and want the non-abstract business object for
> the new table generated.
> --
>
> Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Yes, I completely agree that the correct way to do this is to check for
the existence of the extension class on an individual basis and only
(re)generate those which are missing. I did it the way I did as
Torque/Texen did not contain the needed utility and I looked for the
quickest way to accomplish the task. Please someone, improve it, or I
will eventually improve it after I accidently get my code deleted.
John McNally
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
