on 2/7/01 8:58 PM, "Java Apache CVS Development" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > just wanted to make sure this is noted. i'm cognizant that > making the servlet config a static field in the TurbineBaseService > is not ideal but i think what it provides is useful. > Actually, I'm -1 on this. The issue is that having it static will prevent other Service based systems that point to different ServletConfig objects from being able to work within the same Classloader. Turbine has two cases of using a ServletConfig object. Either through TurbineConfig or through the ServletConfig object that is handed to us from the Servlet Container... Please find a better way to implement this. :-) thanks, -jon -- If you come from a Perl or PHP background, JSP is a way to take your pain to new levels. --Anonymous <http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/> && <http://java.apache.org/turbine/> ------------------------------------------------------------ To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
